An Integrational Approach to Possessor Raising, Ethical Datives, and Adversative Passives

Possessor Raising

Various languages allow instances of external possession—possessive encoding without a possessive structure in DP. The analysis of these cases has long been a battleground of raising versus control. I provide a new argument from Nez Perce in support of possessor raising of a type thematically parallel to raising to subject. The possessor phrase moves from a possessum-DP-internal position to an ...

External Possession and Possessor Raising

External possession is a phenomenon where a nominal is syntactically encoded as a verbal dependent but semantically understood as the possessor of one of its co-arguments. While the general pattern is crosslinguistically very common, there is much variation in its precise syntax and semantics. In this chapter I review the classic analyses of external possession as possessor raising and possesso...

External Possession and Possessor Raising

Reconciling “possessor” datives and “beneficiary” datives – Towards a unified voice account of dative binding in German

This paper argues for a neo-Davidsonian voice approach in the spirit of Kratzer (1996, 2003) to the syntax and semantics of dative arguments in German, and against syntactic or lexical theories of possessor raising. The voice approach is developed in some detail for so-called “possessor” datives, and later on extended to “beneficiary” datives. It is argued that, in both cases, the local contrib...

Japanese Passives as Control/Raising/ECM

Japanese has three passives, Direct (1), Niyotte (2), and Indirect (3), which show different syntactic and semantic characteristics (Hoshi 1999). In this paper, I propose an analysis of Japanese passives as verbs instantiating three types of non-finite complementation: control, raising, and ECM, and argue that the proposed analysis provides a principled account for them. Previous studies have i...